Green Tea Lovers

Environmental News, Environment, Nature, Green living, Oceans, Animals, Universe, Green Network, Weird, Wonderful... all that we care about.

George Monbiot’s retraction on environmental veganism – Missing the point?

pigs factory farm 300x225 George Monbiot’s retraction on environmental veganism – Missing the point?

photo by Compassion in World Farming (Flickr CC)

Environmental writer and Guardian columnist George Monbiot knows a lot more about environmental issues than I do. But his latest article, ‘I was wrong about veganism. Let them eat meat – but farm it properly’, seems too much of a flip-flop: from advocating one ‘extreme’ lifestyle to going a bit close to absolving meat eating’s environmental damage, because theoretically, the livestock industry could be a lot more sustainable.

It is admirable for a public intellectual to admit he was wrong and Monbiot’s article makes good points, gleaned from Simon Fairlie’s book Meat: A Benign Extravagance. But the issue was never black and white. It’s about identifying causes and trying to remedy them via personal lifestyle choices as well as economic, structural and political change.

If pigs are fed on residues and waste, and cattle on straw, stovers and grass from fallows and rangelands – food for which humans don’t compete – meat becomes a very efficient means of food production. Even though it is tilted by the profligate use of grain in rich countries, the global average conversion ratio of useful plant food to useful meat is not the 5:1 or 10:1 cited by almost everyone, but less than 2:1. If we stopped feeding edible grain to animals, we could still produce around half the current global meat supply with no loss to human nutrition: in fact it’s a significant net gain.

–George Monbiot

So should we, who read the Guardian, live in the developed world, etc, simply keep stuffing our faces with burgers until someone changes our wasteful agricultural model – and in turn, the free market system of profits über alles?

I think (at least most) of the arguments in Monbiot’s article have already been made. But the individual action of cutting down on meat and dairy – or ‘going the whole hog’ and becoming vegan if you like – shouldn’t be confused with revamping livestock farming into a more sustainable industry. They are different, albeit related, points.

Of course, the details and accuracy of UN statistics, etc. on the matter should always be revised when new info comes to light. But the fact is that most Guardian readers don’t get their food from sustainable farmers in the developing world, but rather from more or less mechanized farms in the West. Sure, the US is the worst example, but Europe isn’t that great either.

‘Meat Free Monday’ isn’t called ‘Go Vegan or Die’ for a good reason. It stresses that a reasonable, easy adjustment in the modern Western gluttonous diet makes environmental sense. A simple way to reduce waste and greenhouse gas contribution is still to cut down on meat and dairy.

That said, we should all want less sloganeering and more detailed nuanced arguments in order to understand the issue – as Monbiot’s article gives. But unfortunately most people will reduce such arguments to ‘all or nothing’ lifestyle choices – i.e. eat lots of meat from any source whenever I want or be a total vegan. Just read the comment section below the article for proof.

We tend to treat these issues in a ‘religious’ way. Yet people should not consider themselves superior because they are vegan, nor should others react spitefully to what they perceive as arrogance in others, but rather try to live up to what they themselves truly believe is the best lifestyle for the environment – if they care at all.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

YOUR AD HERE? CHECK OUT OUR SPONSORING OPTIONS

You can also log in to post a comment.

Copyright (c) 2009-2011 Greenfudge.org

Register your Account

Your password will be mailed to your account.

A password will be e-mailed to you.