<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copenhagen Becomes First Scandinavian City with a Mandatory Green Roof Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greenfudge.org/2010/06/17/copenhagen-becomes-first-scandinavian-city-with-a-mandatory-green-roof-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greenfudge.org/2010/06/17/copenhagen-becomes-first-scandinavian-city-with-a-mandatory-green-roof-policy/</link>
	<description>Environmental News, Environment, Nature, Green living, Animals, Weird, Wonderful... all that we care about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Stratton</title>
		<link>http://www.greenfudge.org/2010/06/17/copenhagen-becomes-first-scandinavian-city-with-a-mandatory-green-roof-policy/#comment-9611</link>
		<dc:creator>David Stratton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greenfudge.org/?p=10682#comment-9611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, for one, think it&#039;s atrocious that a city would *force* businesses to comply with an environmentalist policy. This is Socialism at its very height. The government will, of course, not furnish any of the money to help build the roofing (not that it should, because that would mean a tax hike nation-wide to pay for something that is a silly, nouveau-socialiste play-thing anyway) and will demand that businesses pay it or pay up. This means that either by increased building costs or by increased administrative upkeep due to fines and penalties, businesses will have to raise prices on EVERYTHING they sell, thereby driving the economy into a nose dive.

And what will a Socialist government like Denmark do? Why, raise taxes to offer businesses a bailout, of course! The only natural solution! What genius! What business acumen! What lovely economic aesthetics! Why, it&#039;s a monetary system par excellence! Yes, let&#039;s please bring more Socialism to the United States of America, since that hasn&#039;t utterly raped, murdered, hacked into pieces, and buried our economy already!

Sorry, just a smidgeon of sarcasm in the foregoing paragraph. In all seriousness, who thinks this is a good idea? Environmentalists are exactly like watermelons: green on the outside, totally Commie-red on the inside, except for the nasty seedy parts that you have to spit out.

And don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m a vegan, I like animals, I think nature is swell. But any idiot who still thinks man-made carbon dioxide contributes to global climate change in the wake of Climate-gate of 2010 is simply foolish! We have hundreds of e-mail records from top-notch enviro-goons at some of the country&#039;s finest educational establishments. These e-mails specifically request that data which would speak contrary to the &quot;global warming&quot; agenda be squelched, gagged, hidden, destroyed, and/or denied. So tell me, HOW is global warming sound, objective science?

At the same time, in the last 10 years we&#039;ve seen the birth of a new field called &quot;cosmoclimatology&quot;, which studies the link between solar output and weather patterns on the earth. What have REAL scientists found? Why, they&#039;ve found that in years of greater solar activity and output, we have experienced higher-than-normal temperature on earth. And in years with lower solar activity? Lower temperatures, naturally.

Why would any but the most egotistical of thinking persons turn to man-made gases before studying the sun when asking the question, &quot;Why is the earth getting hotter?&quot; The sun is a HUGE fiery nuclear reactor in the sky that is constantly radiating our planet with life-giving warmth and kinetic energy, without which no matter how much you hugged the trees, they&#039;d be dead and so would you.

Good grief, Charlie Brown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, for one, think it&#8217;s atrocious that a city would *force* businesses to comply with an environmentalist policy. This is Socialism at its very height. The government will, of course, not furnish any of the money to help build the roofing (not that it should, because that would mean a tax hike nation-wide to pay for something that is a silly, nouveau-socialiste play-thing anyway) and will demand that businesses pay it or pay up. This means that either by increased building costs or by increased administrative upkeep due to fines and penalties, businesses will have to raise prices on EVERYTHING they sell, thereby driving the economy into a nose dive.</p>
<p>And what will a Socialist government like Denmark do? Why, raise taxes to offer businesses a bailout, of course! The only natural solution! What genius! What business acumen! What lovely economic aesthetics! Why, it&#8217;s a monetary system par excellence! Yes, let&#8217;s please bring more Socialism to the United States of America, since that hasn&#8217;t utterly raped, murdered, hacked into pieces, and buried our economy already!</p>
<p>Sorry, just a smidgeon of sarcasm in the foregoing paragraph. In all seriousness, who thinks this is a good idea? Environmentalists are exactly like watermelons: green on the outside, totally Commie-red on the inside, except for the nasty seedy parts that you have to spit out.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m a vegan, I like animals, I think nature is swell. But any idiot who still thinks man-made carbon dioxide contributes to global climate change in the wake of Climate-gate of 2010 is simply foolish! We have hundreds of e-mail records from top-notch enviro-goons at some of the country&#8217;s finest educational establishments. These e-mails specifically request that data which would speak contrary to the &#8220;global warming&#8221; agenda be squelched, gagged, hidden, destroyed, and/or denied. So tell me, HOW is global warming sound, objective science?</p>
<p>At the same time, in the last 10 years we&#8217;ve seen the birth of a new field called &#8220;cosmoclimatology&#8221;, which studies the link between solar output and weather patterns on the earth. What have REAL scientists found? Why, they&#8217;ve found that in years of greater solar activity and output, we have experienced higher-than-normal temperature on earth. And in years with lower solar activity? Lower temperatures, naturally.</p>
<p>Why would any but the most egotistical of thinking persons turn to man-made gases before studying the sun when asking the question, &#8220;Why is the earth getting hotter?&#8221; The sun is a HUGE fiery nuclear reactor in the sky that is constantly radiating our planet with life-giving warmth and kinetic energy, without which no matter how much you hugged the trees, they&#8217;d be dead and so would you.</p>
<p>Good grief, Charlie Brown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
