Global Basecamps

Environmental News, Environment, Nature, Green living, Oceans, Animals, Universe, Green Network, Weird, Wonderful... all that we care about.

Copenhagen Becomes First Scandinavian City with a Mandatory Green Roof Policy

dk green roof Copenhagen Becomes First Scandinavian City with a Mandatory Green Roof Policy

Image Source: LivingRoofs.org.

Last year’s COP-15 event may have achieved “epic fail” status, but that’s certainly not going to stop the former host city—Copenhagen, Denmark—from pushing their green standards a bit further.

Copenhagen is now the first Scandinavian city to put a mandatory green roof policy into action. The new policy requires vegetation and soil to be a mandatory part in architectural planning; in particular, it covers all roofs with a slope less than 30 degrees, plus the refurbishment of older roofs. By putting this new green roof policy into action, it pushes the great Danish city one step closer to reaching their carbon neutral goal by 2025.

Now, as far as the green roofs go, there is a list of specific requirements to consider. Buildings with green roofs must be able to meet at least 2 of the following requirements:

  • The roof must absorb 50-80% of the precipitation that falls on the roof.
  • The roof must provide a cooling and insulating effect of the building and reduce reflection.
  • The roof must help make the city greener, reducing the urban heat island effect, counteracting the increased temperatures in the city.
  • The roof must contribute to a visual and aesthetic architectural variation that has a positive effect on the quality of life.
  • The roof must double the roof life of the roofing membrane by protecting it against UV rays, etc.

So far, at least 30 buildings in Copenhagen have green roofs—and this is before the policy even went into effect. I am curious to see what their next steps will be to add more green to the city.

By Heidi Marshall

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

YOUR AD HERE? CHECK OUT OUR SPONSORING OPTIONS

One comment

  1. David Stratton says:

    I, for one, think it’s atrocious that a city would *force* businesses to comply with an environmentalist policy. This is Socialism at its very height. The government will, of course, not furnish any of the money to help build the roofing (not that it should, because that would mean a tax hike nation-wide to pay for something that is a silly, nouveau-socialiste play-thing anyway) and will demand that businesses pay it or pay up. This means that either by increased building costs or by increased administrative upkeep due to fines and penalties, businesses will have to raise prices on EVERYTHING they sell, thereby driving the economy into a nose dive.

    And what will a Socialist government like Denmark do? Why, raise taxes to offer businesses a bailout, of course! The only natural solution! What genius! What business acumen! What lovely economic aesthetics! Why, it’s a monetary system par excellence! Yes, let’s please bring more Socialism to the United States of America, since that hasn’t utterly raped, murdered, hacked into pieces, and buried our economy already!

    Sorry, just a smidgeon of sarcasm in the foregoing paragraph. In all seriousness, who thinks this is a good idea? Environmentalists are exactly like watermelons: green on the outside, totally Commie-red on the inside, except for the nasty seedy parts that you have to spit out.

    And don’t get me wrong, I’m a vegan, I like animals, I think nature is swell. But any idiot who still thinks man-made carbon dioxide contributes to global climate change in the wake of Climate-gate of 2010 is simply foolish! We have hundreds of e-mail records from top-notch enviro-goons at some of the country’s finest educational establishments. These e-mails specifically request that data which would speak contrary to the “global warming” agenda be squelched, gagged, hidden, destroyed, and/or denied. So tell me, HOW is global warming sound, objective science?

    At the same time, in the last 10 years we’ve seen the birth of a new field called “cosmoclimatology”, which studies the link between solar output and weather patterns on the earth. What have REAL scientists found? Why, they’ve found that in years of greater solar activity and output, we have experienced higher-than-normal temperature on earth. And in years with lower solar activity? Lower temperatures, naturally.

    Why would any but the most egotistical of thinking persons turn to man-made gases before studying the sun when asking the question, “Why is the earth getting hotter?” The sun is a HUGE fiery nuclear reactor in the sky that is constantly radiating our planet with life-giving warmth and kinetic energy, without which no matter how much you hugged the trees, they’d be dead and so would you.

    Good grief, Charlie Brown.

You can also log in to post a comment.

Copyright (c) 2009-2013 Greenfudge.org

Webdesign by Mujo

Register your Account

Your password will be mailed to your account.


A password will be e-mailed to you.