Alkaitis

Environmental News, Environment, Nature, Green living, Oceans, Animals, Universe, Green Network, Weird, Wonderful... all that we care about.

Green economics? Get off of growth already!

consumption economic growth 199x300 Green economics? Get off of growth already!

SM Megamall, Philippines; photo by deckchua (source: Flickr Creative Commons)

I’m not one for proverbs as they tend to be overly reductive and are often used to win arguments simply on the strength of their own renown. But as far as aphorisms go, ‘wealth is wasted on the rich’ is a pretty good one.

Most people understand trite sayings like ‘the best things in life are free’, yet the model of happiness through material acquisition has resoundingly triumphed over other, non consumption-based ideologies. Never mind that it’s inherently unsustainable and that one group or individual’s gain is too often predicated on another’s loss.

But large cracks in the growth based consumption model have been highlighted by the climate crisis and global economic downturn. Other voices are being raised. Recent inroads in alternative, non-growth based economic models that consider environmental issues and sustainability have been made by Nobel prize winner Elinor Ostrom and other forward thinking economists such as Pavan Sukhdev, Noreena Hertz and the New Economics Foundation.

Don’t get me wrong – my knowledge of economics is far from comprehensive and I’m not denying the potential benefits of economic growth in some regions of the world, but I am encouraging you all to check out the work being done by the above economists as well as a recent piece in the Guardian by Christopher Doll entitled ‘Beyond green growth: why we need a world without economic growth’.

So, beyond concepts of green growth or sustainable growth there is also that of ‘no growth’. The latter is distinguished by the fact that it does not equate ‘development’ with economic expansion. The so-called steady state economy would look very different than our current system. We may share jobs, which would mean less income but, if we must still believe that time is money, increasing our time capital would afford us the luxury of doing the things that money can’t, or would no longer be needed to, buy.

–Christopher Doll

I also encourage everyone to watch The Story of Stuff with Annie Leonard for a great illustration of the flaws in our consumption-based economic system.

by Graham Land

Tags: , , , , ,

YOUR AD HERE? CHECK OUT OUR SPONSORING OPTIONS

2 Comments

  1. Graham_Land says:

    Thanks Priscilla.
    I think this is ultimately something we may be forced to do by need rather than ideology, though some restrictions on manufacturers and taxes could put us on the right track because as it is now it’s completely spiraled out of control. The current consumer culture makes the 1970s, when I was born, seem simple and non-materialistic by comparison.

  2. Priscilla says:

    Dear Graham,
    I totally agree with your point. I think we need to rethink the way we produce, work, buy and live. It is a very difficult task, however, to try and step out of our own consumption-based economy and see the bigger picture: that for every thing we buy or own that is not essential to us, somewhere, someone and some piece of nature is likely to have been exploited to get that thing to us. It is just so ridiculous that we then throw the stuff away, dispose of it like it would have no (economic) value enough to think twice before throwing it in the garbage. I find this wisdom very difficult to bear, as when you start looking at the consequences of the useless stuff that is produced just to keep the economy running, it becomes very depressing to be part of a system that shows very little alternatives. I don’t believe people are ready to share their wealth and that is in my opinion the basis of the problem.

You can also log in to post a comment.

Copyright (c) 2009-2013 Greenfudge.org

Webdesign by Mujo

Register your Account

Your password will be mailed to your account.


A password will be e-mailed to you.