photo by FreeCat (source: Flickr Creative Commons)

The threatened bluefin tuna will not be granted protected status. Japan and Canada opposed a ban on international trade on bluefin for economic reasons and received support from many developing nations.

The Guardian reports that the vote at the UN Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) in Qatar tallied 172 member nations against the ban, with 43 in favor and 14 abstentions. The proposed trade ban was introduced by Monaco and had the support of the United States, Norway and Kenya. The European Union requested the implementation of any ban to be delayed until May 2011.

It is understood that the UK, the Netherlands and possibly other European nations voted in favour of the Monaco proposal, against the EU’s official position.


The ban would not have prevented fishermen from selling bluefin tuna on domestic markets. Due to the ban’s failure, the WWF are urging boycotts of bluefin, but with Japan importing 80% of Atlantic bluefin, such international calls may be largely ineffective.

Additional resources:

The Ecologist – Bluefin tuna: can trade bans protect our fisheries?

About The Author: Graham Land

Greenfudge editor and London-based writer Graham Land grew up in the suburbs of Washington, DC, where he was part of the local hardcore punk scene, playing in several bands. Through this musical movement he became involved in grass roots interests such as anti-racist activism, animal rights and Ecology. In 2000 he relocated to Europe, eventually earning an MA from Malmö University in Sweden. He has also lived in Japan, Ireland, Portugal and Greece.


Your business here?

Essentia – Natural Memory Foam Mattresses

Photo of Essentia – Natural Memory Foam Mattresses

Climate Central

No Photo Available

Photo of

Eco-Dentistry Association

Photo of Eco-Dentistry Association